History and Culture: The Past Is Always Present

A very highly regarded social anthropologist, Marshall Sahlins, forever reminds us of the intractable linkage between culture and history.  In his works Historical Metaphors and more recently Apologies to Thucydides he argues with insurmountable depth (pun intended) how cultural significance cannot be understood without its historical context.  There is no “which came first, the chicken or the egg?”, there is only both history and culture, changing and determining, determining and changing each other, indefinitely.

From a Marshall Sahlins introduction:  “The great challenge to an historical anthropology is not merely to know how events are ordered by culture, but how, in that process, the culture is reordered.”

And, from a Marshall Sahlins conclusion:  “Powered by disconformities between conventional values and intentional values...the historical process unfolds as a continuous and reciprocal movement between the practice of the structure and the structure of the practice”

What does this have to do with organizational culture?  ‘Continuous and reciprocal movement’!  The reason we study organizational culture is because we want to change organizational culture.  Still, our history is always there.  The objective of a culture change program (practice of the structure), especially when insulated to function independently and quickly to change culture, may miss the point that it cannot be removed from its dynamic historical context (the structure of the practice).

The founder’s history matters, even as “intentional values” become “conventional values”.  This “DNA” mutates and survives and only over a prolonged period of time.

Ed makes this point in his historical anthropology of Digital Equipment Corporation DEC Is Dead, Long Live DEC:  “…seeing and accepting a problem as a problem does not guarantee the ability or the willingness to do something about it.  Insight is not enough if the cultural DNA does not support the changes that would be needed to act on the insight”.

Our partners at Human Synergistics are also careful to illuminate this point with their clients using culture assessments (OCI and OEI) – "Practice of the structure" changes can be made quite readily and visibly, yet these “climate” adaptations do not necessarily correspond to nor quickly lead to culture changes.  Culture changes, such as movement toward more constructive styles, happen over years and over dimensions, rather than in quick straight lines.

~ Peter Schein

A Starting Point

This is our first post, and we intend to add many more.  We'll use this forum to talk about things that are on our minds, trends that we think are important, other ideas we consider worth reading and thinking about, and projects that we are pursuing that are of shared interest.

Our 1.0 Logo

The three concentric circles may mean many things to many people.  For us, the three circles are both a bullseye representing the challenge and reward of aligning culture and organizational leadership and design.  And, the three circles around the bullseye represent the three levels of organizational culture that Ed has been talking about since the early 1980s -- Artifacts, espoused values, and the inner circle, tacit assumptions.  A deep understanding of organizational culture requires visibility and understanding of all three levels, all three circles.  That is our starting point.

If you want to read more about the three levels, take a quick look at Ed's Wikipedia entry "Schein's organizational culture model"

And stay tuned for more...